THE PEOPLE OF INDIA
The congress basically a creation of westernised INDIANS of yester years has so far successfully won the confidence of a sizable public to be able to rule the nation through a constitution created by them. People with differences of opinion then and now despite several attempts in different combinations have not been able to change the underlying trust in CONGRESS.
THE REASON?
India is a pluralistic society. Indians are growing in number.The young majority considers the elderly minority an obsolete lot .The division on the lines of proportionate modernity is clear.with no single leader in command throughout the length and breadth of the indian territory indians fail to understand as to what really is their national interest and in what way they can contribute towards that goal.Ism concept takes the last place in this struggle for administrative control and the administrative machinery which is subservient to the political supremacy created by those vested interests in the form of quotas in administration and political representation which leads to conflict between masters and subordinates in administration resulting in sycophancy, arrogance and administrative stalemate which today we call deficit in administration.
DETERIORATION:
Deterioration of Indian polity is probably because of the creation of the union by the same leadership who struggled for independence and no separate political exercise was carried out to cross check the suitability of the framework.The thinking of AZAD HIND FOUZ,THE ASPIRATIONS OF THE HINDU OUTFITS,AND THE POLICY OF APPEASEMENT in the name of secularism were not considered vital for the Indian economic independence .
Even today the protagonists of economic rationalization are easily dubbed communal and the corrupt power brokers despite their all round failure are likely to continue at the helm of the affairs of the state with visible signs of dynastic rule which may eventually end by ascendance of bachelors only governments.
To that extent likes of MAMATA,MAYA,NAVEEN,JAYA may join the RAHUL band wagon discarding NARENDRA MODI in view of DIGVIJAY'S discovery that MODI in actuality is a married man and Mrs gandhi may not find it difficult to find out another bachelor in congress if the most eligible bachelor shows his reluctance to foot the bill.
The congress basically a creation of westernised INDIANS of yester years has so far successfully won the confidence of a sizable public to be able to rule the nation through a constitution created by them. People with differences of opinion then and now despite several attempts in different combinations have not been able to change the underlying trust in CONGRESS.
THE REASON?
India is a pluralistic society. Indians are growing in number.The young majority considers the elderly minority an obsolete lot .The division on the lines of proportionate modernity is clear.with no single leader in command throughout the length and breadth of the indian territory indians fail to understand as to what really is their national interest and in what way they can contribute towards that goal.Ism concept takes the last place in this struggle for administrative control and the administrative machinery which is subservient to the political supremacy created by those vested interests in the form of quotas in administration and political representation which leads to conflict between masters and subordinates in administration resulting in sycophancy, arrogance and administrative stalemate which today we call deficit in administration.
DETERIORATION:
Deterioration of Indian polity is probably because of the creation of the union by the same leadership who struggled for independence and no separate political exercise was carried out to cross check the suitability of the framework.The thinking of AZAD HIND FOUZ,THE ASPIRATIONS OF THE HINDU OUTFITS,AND THE POLICY OF APPEASEMENT in the name of secularism were not considered vital for the Indian economic independence .
Even today the protagonists of economic rationalization are easily dubbed communal and the corrupt power brokers despite their all round failure are likely to continue at the helm of the affairs of the state with visible signs of dynastic rule which may eventually end by ascendance of bachelors only governments.
To that extent likes of MAMATA,MAYA,NAVEEN,JAYA may join the RAHUL band wagon discarding NARENDRA MODI in view of DIGVIJAY'S discovery that MODI in actuality is a married man and Mrs gandhi may not find it difficult to find out another bachelor in congress if the most eligible bachelor shows his reluctance to foot the bill.
